Social comment analysis should help a team understand what people are discussing and what requires action. Start with the underlying messages rather than a single sentiment score. A complaint about delivery, a joke, a threat, and a quoted news story should not enter the same response queue.
01
Create a usable sample
Define the time period, sources, language, and inclusion rules. Keep enough context to understand a reply without gathering unnecessary personal details. Distinguish original comments from reposts and repeated messages. For US and Mexico analysis, review regional vocabulary and mixed-language comments with someone who understands the audience.
- Tag the subject: service, price, product, communication, or another relevant theme.
- Separate actionable requests from general reactions.
- Flag credible safety or privacy concerns for appropriate review.
02
Check automated labels against examples
Example: “Great, another week without an answer” may contain a positive word but express frustration. A message praising staff while criticizing billing has more than one theme. Review a sample of automated classifications and record common errors. Do not assume a translation preserves sarcasm, severity, or the identity of the person being criticized.
03
Connect findings to decisions
AMEC’s evaluation approach distinguishes communication activity from meaningful outcomes. Use the same discipline when summarizing comments: explain recurring issues, who is affected, and what evidence supports the conclusion. Assign relevant concerns to an owner and review whether the response reduces repeat questions. Preserve uncertainty when the sample is incomplete or highly concentrated.
Frequently asked questions
Does a rise in negative comments always mean reputation declined?
No. Volume can change after publicity, a reporting change, or repeated copies. Inspect the sources, themes, and audience before interpreting the trend.
Can we delete criticism to improve the dashboard score?
That would conceal feedback rather than improve the underlying experience. Apply legitimate moderation rules consistently and keep analysis honest about what was included or excluded.
Continue with your next step
Related guides on this topic
Sources and policies
Check the current policy before submitting a request.
You do not have to figure out the next step alone.
Share the URLs and explain your concern. We will review the context and explain which options are worth assessing.
Request a confidential reviewOr call (307) 429-2531Educational information, not legal advice. Outcomes depend on the facts and decisions made by third parties.