Section 230 is a US federal statute relevant to certain claims involving online services and third-party content. It is not a universal exemption from every law, a promise that content must remain online, or an automatic right to have a platform remove it.
01
Separate the speaker from the service
A first question is who created or developed the information and what conduct the complaint concerns. A user's post and the platform hosting it are not automatically treated as the same actor. The statute addresses publisher-or-speaker treatment of information from another content provider and certain good-faith moderation activity. Applying those provisions requires attention to the facts and the claim.
02
Do not overlook limits and exceptions
The statute includes exceptions and preserves specified areas of law, including federal criminal law and intellectual-property law, with additional provisions addressing other subjects. Court interpretation matters. Avoid declaring that a platform is always immune or always liable based on a short online summary. This is a general orientation, not a legal conclusion about a particular dispute or a substitute for qualified US counsel.
- Preserve the exact content, URL, dates, and platform response.
- Identify the allegedly unlawful act and who performed it.
- Ask counsel which jurisdiction and claim are relevant.
03
Keep policy reporting separate
A platform may review content under its rules regardless of whether a legal claim against it would succeed. For example, an impersonation report should explain the applicable policy and identity evidence, not simply cite Section 230 as a removal demand. For Mexican matters, do not present this US statute as Mexican law; cross-border questions need their own analysis.
Frequently asked questions
Does Section 230 protect the original author of a harmful post?
Do not assume that. The author’s responsibility and a host’s potential protections are distinct questions requiring case-specific legal review.
Can an agency guarantee removal by invoking this section?
No. The statute is not a universal takedown mechanism. Use the appropriate policy or legal route supported by actual facts.
Continue with your next step
Related guides on this topic
Sources and policies
Check the current policy before submitting a request.
You do not have to figure out the next step alone.
Share the URLs and explain your concern. We will review the context and explain which options are worth assessing.
Request a confidential reviewOr call (307) 429-2531Educational information, not legal advice. Outcomes depend on the facts and decisions made by third parties.