A Wikipedia article can give readers an overview of a notable subject, but the subject does not own the article or control its tone. It is not a company landing page. Assess whether your expectations fit an independently edited encyclopedia before pursuing any contribution.
01
Expect a balanced account, not promotion
English Wikipedia’s neutral point of view policy calls for fair treatment of significant published views. Reliable critical coverage can therefore be relevant alongside achievements. A company biography written to maximize sales is not the right starting document. Consider whether you would accept accurate information that is important to the subject even when it is not flattering.
02
Prepare evidence rather than preferred wording
Example: a company changed its name and wants the article updated. Organize reliable sources documenting the change and identify the precise passage affected. A clear correction question is easier to assess than a request to replace an article with promotional language. Avoid presenting a press release as independent approval of every company claim.
- Identify what is verifiably wrong or outdated.
- Distinguish independent sources from material you publish yourself.
- Keep requests concise and connected to the article’s scope.
03
Disclose relevant relationships
English Wikipedia provides conflict-of-interest and paid-contribution guidance, including disclosure expectations and a route to propose changes for review. Follow the rules of the relevant language edition and the platform’s terms. Do not seek hidden favorable editing, guaranteed permanence, or removal of well-supported criticism simply because it affects marketing goals.
Frequently asked questions
Does an article guarantee better search rankings?
No. An encyclopedia article is not a guaranteed search placement or endorsement. Its content and visibility can change independently of your company’s preferences.
What if there is not enough independent coverage?
Do not manufacture coverage or force a promotional article. Improve your own accurate public information and let any future encyclopedic assessment follow the project’s sourcing and inclusion standards.
Continue with your next step
Related guides on this topic
Sources and policies
Check the current policy before submitting a request.
You do not have to figure out the next step alone.
Share the URLs and explain your concern. We will review the context and explain which options are worth assessing.
Request a confidential reviewOr call (307) 429-2531Educational information, not legal advice. Outcomes depend on the facts and decisions made by third parties.