Wikipedia discussions use shorthand for content standards and community processes. Understanding the terms helps you follow a decision, but knowing the vocabulary does not give you authority over an article or excuse a conflict of interest.
01
Read the language of a revision
An edit summary is the contributor's brief explanation of a change. A diff compares revisions so you can see what changed. A revert restores earlier content, while an edit war involves repeated competing changes instead of resolving the disagreement appropriately. If someone cites a shortcut such as NPOV, open the linked policy rather than guessing its meaning from the abbreviation.
02
Distinguish evidence from agreement
A reliable source is assessed in context; notability concerns whether a subject qualifies for coverage under relevant guidance. Consensus is a policy-informed community process, not simply a headcount of supporters. A talk page is where article-related issues are discussed. A conflict of interest arises from relevant outside relationships, even when the contributor believes their proposed wording is accurate.
- Read the policy linked by a shortcut before replying.
- Use the diff to identify the exact disputed change.
- Ask a concise question when a term is unclear.
03
Recognize participation problems
Sockpuppetry involves misuse of multiple accounts; canvassing concerns attempts to influence discussion by selectively recruiting participants. Do not create accounts or mobilize employees to manufacture support. For example, if a colleague suggests asking the whole office to endorse a request, stop and review the participation rules. Provide evidence through the proper process instead of trying to make a commercial preference look like independent consensus.
Frequently asked questions
Does “not notable” mean the person is unimportant?
No. It describes suitability under encyclopedia inclusion criteria, not a judgment of personal worth or business quality.
Are all terms and templates identical across languages?
No. Core ideas overlap, but procedures and template names can differ. Check the guidance for the edition in which you intend to participate.
Continue with your next step
Related guides on this topic
Sources and policies
Check the current policy before submitting a request.
You do not have to figure out the next step alone.
Share the URLs and explain your concern. We will review the context and explain which options are worth assessing.
Request a confidential reviewOr call (307) 429-2531Educational information, not legal advice. Outcomes depend on the facts and decisions made by third parties.