Wikipedia participation is governed by editorial policies and community processes rather than a client's preferred narrative. Begin with neutrality, verifiability and the prohibition on original research, then understand notability and disclosure requirements before proposing content about yourself or an organization you represent.
01
Understand what belongs in the article
Neutrality requires appropriate representation of significant viewpoints in reliable sources, not equal space for every opinion or removal of all criticism. Verifiability asks whether readers can check published support. Original-research restrictions prevent contributors from introducing their own unpublished analysis. A hypothetical business claim that two events prove misconduct should not appear merely because each event can be sourced separately.
02
Separate article eligibility from individual facts
Notability concerns whether a topic merits a standalone article; sourcing concerns what a particular statement can support. A company website may verify a straightforward detail without demonstrating independent significant coverage. Biographies of living people require additional care with sensitive or contentious material. These standards operate together, and a polished writing style cannot compensate for missing evidence or an inappropriate encyclopedic purpose.
- Match proposed statements to suitable published sources and preserve their qualifications.
- Check the relevant subject guidance and language edition before choosing a process.
- Distinguish a correction request from a promotional rewrite of the whole page.
03
Participate transparently and respectfully
Disclose conflicts of interest and required paid relationships, and use appropriate talk-page or review processes. Do not pretend to be independent, solicit artificial consensus or repeatedly override other editors. English Wikipedia also has current restrictions on AI-generated article text, so external AI drafting is not a shortcut to compliant submission. Learn the live instructions for the specific task and accept that no provider can guarantee acceptance or editorial control.
Frequently asked questions
Are the same procedures used in every language?
Core Wikimedia commitments overlap, but language communities have their own detailed policies and processes. Check the edition involved rather than copying an English workflow mechanically.
Can accurate company copy simply be pasted into Wikipedia?
No. Accuracy alone does not address copyright, promotional tone, relevance, sourcing or conflicts of interest. Encyclopedia content requires its own policy-compliant treatment and review.
Continue with your next step
Related guides on this topic
Sources and policies
Check the current policy before submitting a request.
You do not have to figure out the next step alone.
Share the URLs and explain your concern. We will review the context and explain which options are worth assessing.
Request a confidential reviewOr call (307) 429-2531Educational information, not legal advice. Outcomes depend on the facts and decisions made by third parties.